GapDiverge
About us
The system behind the setups.
Origin
We have been trading Bitcoin for over 10 years, through more cycles, fake breakouts, and "this time it is different" narratives than we can count.
The strongest setups rarely came from a single indicator. A divergence on its own was interesting. A CME gap on its own was interesting. But when the two appeared together, supported by trend, volume, and confirmation across timeframes, the setups became noticeably stronger.
That observation is why GapDiverge exists. We took what we had been doing manually, refined it, and built it into a scoring system. Every setup is measured against the same criteria, scored from 0 to 100, and published with its entry, stop, target, and eventual outcome.
Transparency
Why we publish everything
GapDiverge was built for ourselves first. When we decided to make it public, transparency was non-negotiable. Every qualifying setup stays in the record, wins and losses alike. No highlight reel and no quietly removing trades that did not work.
Consistency
One rule set, every setup
The goal is to turn a pattern we have studied for years into clear, consistent Bitcoin market intelligence. The score never changes to fit a narrative. A setup either meets the threshold or it does not.
Risk
A note on responsibility
GapDiverge is built for education and market analysis. Nothing published here is financial advice or a guarantee of future results. Markets involve real risk, and every trading decision remains your own.
Questions or feedback? Reach out at hello@gapdiverge.com.